Initiative 933 - Part of Americans for Limited Government's National Campaign
Americans for Limited Government is running a national effort to repeal state and local zoning laws and environmental protections. These laws and regulations protect individual homeowners and businesses by setting community standards and promoting certainty that inappropriate development will not decrease the value and use of your property.
In Washington State they have contributed over $260,000 toward passing Initiative 933. But Washington State is not alone in Americans for Limited Government's efforts to repeal zoning and growth management protections.
Americans for Limited Government is also behind initiative efforts to overturn zoning, growth management and environmental protection safeguards in Arizona, California, Idaho, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, as well as Washington State.
Recently a cartoon video showed up at a website in Washington State supporting Initiative 933. www.yeson933.com. (See also PDC complaint by Evergreen Politics) This same video has also shown up on other states' websites. Minor modifications are made to localize each video to each state, like a local freeway and the local initiative. Not surprising when looking up the media creator - Political Media is the fact that its President Larry Ward was involved in working with the US Chamber of Commerce on Bush's re-election. He also was involved with the National Coalition on Black Civic Participation to help turn out the African American Vote for Bush.
The cartoon video is a hideous misrepresentation of the issues and facts involved The video is intent on portraying corrupt politicians in cahoots with Mafia Developers intent on taking away your home and business and church. They are obviously trying to reach Latino voters and black voters and young voters and the conservative Christian Right and are doing so with racial stereotypes.
The appeal is to scare Americans into unjustified fear that the evil politicians are going to kick you out of your home and tear down your church and shut minority businesses down. It is a campaign pandering to fear, intent on creating further racial division and further distrust in government.
Does this racial division get results? Well the California Black Chamber of Commerce must believe it because they issued a press release urging voters to support Prop 90 - the "Protect our Homes Initiative on the Nov. Ballot.
Here is the video on Arizona's site - "Hope for Arizona" which is pushing Prop 207. They even issued a press release, saying it depicted "eminent domain abuse". They make no mention of the fact that the video is also being used in other states and is part of a national effort..
A disclaimer at the bottom of the Arizona ad says "This message is sponsored by the Arizona Home Owners Protection Effort. Neither HBO nor any individuals affiliated with HBO approved, sponsored or endorsed this message." It's also available for iPOD and PSP and a link to MySpace shows it prominently at the top of the page.
Here is the video on Nevada's site for a "Property Owners Bill of Rights. And here is Idaho's site This House is my Home, promoting passage of Prop 2 in Idaho.
And not to leave any stone unturned, this politics of division is also being used to pass their message on to not just black voters and Latino voters and young voters but also through churches. The Americans for Limited Government Foundation has put up a website called "Protect our Homes and Churches
The website says they "are a growing coalition of pastors who are fighting eminent domain abuse.Right now, in many states, local politicians can take homes and churches away from their owners and give them to private developers. Too often, the victims are those who don't have the resources to fight back."
As Bush and Rove found, the politics of division works. And so does building strategic coalitions with unlikely interests whose ultimate goals are very different. Members of the black and Latino community often work in low paying jobs. Americans for Limited Government is not interested in seeing government raise the minimum wage or provide adequate health care or lower the price of subscription drugs.
Americans for Limited Government is interested in just that - limited government. Their goals are very different from those of many of the people they are recruiting to support their causes. Americans for Limited Government's Chairman, Howard Rich, for example also sits on the Boards of the CATO Institute, the Club for Rome and the Rose and Milton Friedman Foundation - all conservative right wing groups. Rich was a prominent former member of the National Libertarian Party. Rich is in fact a multimillionaire real estate developer. Don't you see something phony about their cartoon video?
In Washington State you can viisit the website of those opposed to I-933 at www.noon933.org You can volunteer to help spread the message about the deceitful tactics of the proponents of Initiative 933.
see also these other recent posts on MajorityRulesBlog
-Initiative 933 - Who is Howie Rich?
-A Simple Reason to Oppose Initiative 933
In addition check out these recent posts on DailyKos:
- Yes on 933 is Lying to Rural Property Rights Activists about Eminent Domain by reifman
- http://www.dailykos.com/user/sandlapper
- http://www.dailykos.com/tag/eminent%20domain
In Washington State they have contributed over $260,000 toward passing Initiative 933. But Washington State is not alone in Americans for Limited Government's efforts to repeal zoning and growth management protections.
Americans for Limited Government is also behind initiative efforts to overturn zoning, growth management and environmental protection safeguards in Arizona, California, Idaho, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, North Dakota, as well as Washington State.
Recently a cartoon video showed up at a website in Washington State supporting Initiative 933. www.yeson933.com. (See also PDC complaint by Evergreen Politics) This same video has also shown up on other states' websites. Minor modifications are made to localize each video to each state, like a local freeway and the local initiative. Not surprising when looking up the media creator - Political Media is the fact that its President Larry Ward was involved in working with the US Chamber of Commerce on Bush's re-election. He also was involved with the National Coalition on Black Civic Participation to help turn out the African American Vote for Bush.
The cartoon video is a hideous misrepresentation of the issues and facts involved The video is intent on portraying corrupt politicians in cahoots with Mafia Developers intent on taking away your home and business and church. They are obviously trying to reach Latino voters and black voters and young voters and the conservative Christian Right and are doing so with racial stereotypes.
The appeal is to scare Americans into unjustified fear that the evil politicians are going to kick you out of your home and tear down your church and shut minority businesses down. It is a campaign pandering to fear, intent on creating further racial division and further distrust in government.
Does this racial division get results? Well the California Black Chamber of Commerce must believe it because they issued a press release urging voters to support Prop 90 - the "Protect our Homes Initiative on the Nov. Ballot.
Here is the video on Arizona's site - "Hope for Arizona" which is pushing Prop 207. They even issued a press release, saying it depicted "eminent domain abuse". They make no mention of the fact that the video is also being used in other states and is part of a national effort..
A disclaimer at the bottom of the Arizona ad says "This message is sponsored by the Arizona Home Owners Protection Effort. Neither HBO nor any individuals affiliated with HBO approved, sponsored or endorsed this message." It's also available for iPOD and PSP and a link to MySpace shows it prominently at the top of the page.
Here is the video on Nevada's site for a "Property Owners Bill of Rights. And here is Idaho's site This House is my Home, promoting passage of Prop 2 in Idaho.
And not to leave any stone unturned, this politics of division is also being used to pass their message on to not just black voters and Latino voters and young voters but also through churches. The Americans for Limited Government Foundation has put up a website called "Protect our Homes and Churches
The website says they "are a growing coalition of pastors who are fighting eminent domain abuse.Right now, in many states, local politicians can take homes and churches away from their owners and give them to private developers. Too often, the victims are those who don't have the resources to fight back."
As Bush and Rove found, the politics of division works. And so does building strategic coalitions with unlikely interests whose ultimate goals are very different. Members of the black and Latino community often work in low paying jobs. Americans for Limited Government is not interested in seeing government raise the minimum wage or provide adequate health care or lower the price of subscription drugs.
Americans for Limited Government is interested in just that - limited government. Their goals are very different from those of many of the people they are recruiting to support their causes. Americans for Limited Government's Chairman, Howard Rich, for example also sits on the Boards of the CATO Institute, the Club for Rome and the Rose and Milton Friedman Foundation - all conservative right wing groups. Rich was a prominent former member of the National Libertarian Party. Rich is in fact a multimillionaire real estate developer. Don't you see something phony about their cartoon video?
In Washington State you can viisit the website of those opposed to I-933 at www.noon933.org You can volunteer to help spread the message about the deceitful tactics of the proponents of Initiative 933.
see also these other recent posts on MajorityRulesBlog
-Initiative 933 - Who is Howie Rich?
-A Simple Reason to Oppose Initiative 933
In addition check out these recent posts on DailyKos:
- Yes on 933 is Lying to Rural Property Rights Activists about Eminent Domain by reifman
- http://www.dailykos.com/user/sandlapper
- http://www.dailykos.com/tag/eminent%20domain
Posted by Steve Zemke at 1:23 PM | Permanent Link
2 Comments:
Initiative 933 doesn't protect small property owners. In fact it puts the value of their property at more risk to loss because it would void zoning and environmental protections and growth management laws.
When someone buys property they understand that it is an investment - there are no guaranteed returns on an investment. It does not mean you can do anthing you want with your property. You must abide by local zoning laws and regulations.
If you plan to build something on your property and current laws allow it, you file for a building permit and have the rights to build on it vest. That way you can build on the property under the rules before the law changes.
I wish I could buy stocks under an I-933 type law. It sure would be nice to have an investment with no risk because I could sue the government for lost value anytime they did something that I believe negatively affected the economy.
Communities change over the years and people have the right to make decisions about what type of community they want. Laws, rules and regulations change and you can speak out against changes you don't agree with and put new people in office that agree with you. But time doesn't stand still.
Because you could have a gravel pit on your land when a community was rural but it is now suburban, should you still be able to rip up the land even if it is now surrounded by housing developments? Because you could once rip up a streambed or fill in a wetland, should you still be able to do it when we now realize it can cause flooding downstream and damage other peoples property?
There is a need for balance but I-933 puts the power in the hands of people that want to develop land irregardless of the cost or consequences to others nearby and takes away the power of homeowners and small business and farmers to make a collective decision to protect their property values and lifestyle. They don't want to see inappropriate developmemt decrease the value of their land.
I-933 does not allow for neighboring property owners to sue if something is being built next to them that damages their property value.
I-933 is sometimes said to be about takings. If we want to legalize that concept we also need to institute a givings clause. If a community decides to add a sewer line or repair a road that adds value to your property, should owners of the property immediately pay for the total increased value of the property caused by government action. You may pay some increase in taxes but not a total amount all at once. If you think some government action has "damaged" the value of your property, then you can ask to have your taxes reassessed at a lower value.
I-933 is not the answer - it basically turns the power of zoning and growth management over to development interests. Vote No on Initiative 933 on Nov.7th.
Unfortunately I-933 doesn't protect private property. What it does do is say that developers and development interests can try to ignore rules and regulations passed by communities to protect communites from inappropriate development.
It may allow you to do something to your property that the community doen't want but the reverse is that you have no protection from what your neighbor might to to his property that adversely affects you.
Unfortunately it cuts both ways and you will not be able to get compensated by the government, i.e. taxpayers, for someting your neighbor builds or destroys on his property that might "lower" the value of your land.
It's called free for all develoment and if you're familiar with Auroa Ave in Seattle Wa then that's just what your neighborhood might look like because remember you think it's not right for communities to control growth or develompment.
So if your neighbor can build a racetrack for cars next door to you and you don't want that what can you do? I-933 and you are saying he should be able to do whatever he wants with his land.
Now do you advocate that we use your tax dollars and mine to pay him not to do that?
Post a Comment
<< Home